➤ The Flynn Effect describes a 20th-century rise in IQ scores (3 points per decade), driven by improved nutrition, education, technology, and societal changes. James R. Flynn documented this rise across different cultures and intelligence tests, showing that modern generations score significantly higher on IQ tests compared to those from a century ago.
➤ However, a reverse Flynn Effect shows declines in some regions, possibly linked to population changes or modern lifestyle factors, though evidence remains inconclusive. The decline in IQ could impact future technological innovation, economic growth, and problem-solving abilities, potentially exacerbating social inequalities.
➤ Intelligence is dynamic, shaped by both environment and genetics. The dynamic nature of intelligence, as demonstrated by both the Flynn and reverse Flynn Effects, calls the need for modern, adaptable assessments like the RIOT IQ Test.
Have you ever wondered if humanity is getting smarter with each passing generation? It’s a bold question, and one that’s been stirring debate among psychologists, scientists, and curious minds for decades. Enter the Flynn Effect—a phenomenon that suggests IQ scores have been steadily rising over the 20th century saying that people today score significantly higher on intelligence tests than their grandparents did at the same age. But what does this mean? Are we truly evolving into brainier people, or is there more to the story?
Let’s dive in.
The Flynn Effect refers to the substantial increase in IQ scores observed in many countries throughout the 20th century. The rise in IQ scores was first reported by Rundquist (1936) and later confirmed by Smith (1942) and Tuddenham (1948). In England, Cattell (1951) reported a similar trend and later concluded that the growth in IQ scores was already a worldwide phenomenon.
The phenomenon was named "the Flynn Effect" after James R. Flynn popularized it and documented it using data from several different Intelligence tests. In conducting large-scale studies, he found substantial gains in mean IQ scores, with an increase of 3 points per decade in full-scale IQ scores. Since then, there has been an explosion of research on the Flynn Effect, with over 371 studies documented as of 2023. It has also been observed across different intelligence tests and cultures, with researchers finding that it is not only occurring in wealthy countries, but is increasingly being observed in economically developing countries as well.
In Flynn's influential TED Talk in 2013, he claimed that people today get far more questions correct on IQ tests than the generations that preceded them since the tests were first invented. Earlier generations predominantly employed concrete thinking, analyzing the world "primarily in terms of how much it would benefit them." Flynn documented how previous generations approached categorization tasks differently, grouping items based on practical utility rather than abstract taxonomic relationships. When asked to identify commonalities between objects, they typically provided utilitarian answers rather than logical classifications that would score higher on modern tests.
Modern society, by contrast, rewards abstract reasoning, hypothetical thinking, and scientific categorization—precisely the cognitive skills measured by most intelligence tests. Rather than reflecting biological evolution, Flynn demonstrated these gains stem from fundamental changes in thinking styles—from concrete, utilitarian reasoning to abstract, hypothetical, and scientific thinking.
These findings fundamentally challenge static views of human intelligence, revealing cognitive abilities as highly responsive to environmental influences. This leads us to ask: What specific environmental factors influenced the rise of IQ?
So, what’s behind this brainpower boost? There are several theories as to what contributes to the rise in IQ scores. While the exact reasons are still being debated, most research points to a combination of environmental, educational, and societal changes:
Family dynamics, including size, parental involvement, and home environment, play a crucial role in intellectual development. Key findings about the impact of family characteristics are the following:
Smaller family sizes allow parents to allocate more resources and attention to each child. While some research suggests that smaller families contribute to IQ gains, findings on this relationship are mixed, with some studies suggesting a positive correlation between high fertility rates and IQ growth.
Active parental engagement, access to educational materials, and improvements in socioeconomic conditions all enhance brain growth. Most parents have limited income, and so smaller families mean that each child gets a larger share of parents' resources.
Children from literate and resource-rich families tend to exhibit higher IQ scores, benefiting from enriched learning environments.
With fewer kids to wrangle, parents can pour more time, love, and books into each one. Parents in big families are engaged, too—but one thing’s clear: engaged parents and resource-rich homes breed brighter minds.
Education has been a key driver of the Flynn Effect, with the expansion and improvement of educational systems playing a major role in rising IQ scores. Specific educational factors include:
Increased school enrollment, literacy rates, and extended years of schooling have provided more individuals with opportunities to develop cognitive abilities, particularly in areas like perceptual skills, concept formation, and memory, which are crucial for intelligence tests.
Today’s classrooms drill abstract problem-solving, the exact stuff IQ test creators love, and have further enhanced intelligence by strengthening critical thinking skills
While education does not fully explain all IQ gains, it remains a contributor to the Flynn Effect, with longer schooling and higher-quality education strengthening intellectual development globally.
The advent of modern technologies has introduced new intellectual challenges and learning opportunities:
Regular interaction with technology demands skills such as spatial reasoning, working memory, and information processing.
The digital environment demands and develops cognitive flexibility, which may help people consider different approaches to solving problems on tests.
Learning has shifted from hands-on tasks to symbolic representations. For example, washing clothes once involved psychomotor skills due to direct interaction with the task itself. Now, the same task is completed by making out instructions from a washing machine (symbolic representation).
Technology has made entertainment more cognitively demanding. Modern gaming encourages people to engage with complex problems and find multi-step solutions. Even television programs are more complex today than in the 20th century, with more complex plots and more dialogue than before. These cognitive demands may build people’s mental abilities and help them solve the short, formal problems on intelligence tests.
Computers, the internet, even video games—they’re like gym workouts for your brain. Spatial skills, problem solving, lightning-fast information processing: tech is throwing curveballs our ancestors never saw. Still, significant IQ leaps in tech-scarce nations hint there is more to this puzzle, but technology continues to be a relevant factor considering its potential contribution to the Flynn Effect.
Increased economic prosperity in a country seems to occur at the same time that its IQ scores increase, suggesting a link between cognitive ability and wealth in a population.
Economic growth has led to improved living standards, providing better access to education, healthcare, and stimulating environments that promote cognitive development. Higher socioeconomic status enables families to invest more in their children's intellectual development through quality education, enriched home environments, and extracurricular experiences.
Wealthier nations with better schools, healthcare, and living standards consistently flex higher IQs. Economic booms mean families can splurge on tutors, toys, and trips that spark young minds. As economies develop, these factors contribute to overall cognitive advancements, making them a key player in the global rise in IQ scores documented by the Flynn Effect. It’s not snobbery; it’s opportunity turning into cognitive gold.
Here’s a wild one: smarts can snowball. A little boost—like a good teacher or a cool app—spreads through communities, making everyone sharper. James Flynn called it the social multiplier effect.
The social multiplier effect suggests that even small environmental advantages can amplify intelligence gains over time by creating a reinforcing cycle of cognitive improvements through societal interactions. As individuals engage with increasingly complex environments, their cognitive skills are further enhanced, creating a feedback loop that promotes continuous intellectual growth. For intelligence, these "social multipliers" can lead to an overall increase in cognitive abilities across the population. This happens because society places more focus on cognitive performance, and individuals are exposed to environments that stimulate their thinking. Whether certain abilities improve depends on which abilities society emphasizes.
When society obsesses over brainy skills, we all level up.
Finally, it is thought that people's increased familiarity with intelligence tests help to explain the Flynn Effect. As individuals become more accustomed to test formats and content through repeated practice, their scores may improve, at least in the short term. Test-taking behavior, particularly in the context of multiple-choice formats, has also been considered a factor in the phenomenon. Changes in test-taking strategies, such as increased guessing and better time management, may lead to higher scores.
Practice makes perfect, and modern individuals have much more experience with tests than their great-grandparents did. We’ve cracked the code: guessing smarter, spotting patterns, nailing strategies. It’s not cheating; it’s adapting. And it’s a handy trick up our sleeve.
Higher scores don’t mean we’d outsmart Einstein. The Flynn Effect shines brightest in fluid intelligence—think quick, on-the-fly problem-solving, not the deep wisdom of experience. Our great-grandparents might answer fewer questions on a modern test, but could still function well in their environment. Maybe we’re not smarter in some respects, but just more wired for today’s world.
Here’s the twist: in places like Scandinavia and the UK, the Flynn Effect is hitting the brakes—or even reversing. Despite the long-term trend of rising IQ scores, researchers have observed a decline in IQ scores in some countries over the past few decades. It raises concerns about whether the factors that once boosted intelligence are now reversing, or if new societal changes are impeding cognitive development. As of now, it is not yet clear why this is happening, and the consistency of this effect has yet to be determined.
The Flynn Effect and its reverse twin scream one thing: intelligence isn’t set in stone. It’s a mirror reflecting how our world—food, families, schools, tech, wealth—shapes our minds. This highlights the complex relationship between genetics, environment, and socio-economic factors in shaping intelligence. Genes play a role, sure, but the environment is the DJ spinning this track.
We’re not out-evolving our ancestors; we’re just playing a different game. Whether we’re truly getting brighter or just better at playing the IQ game, one thing’s clear: humanity’s mind is a dynamic, ever-shifting thing.
If you are interested in getting an accurate measure of your IQ and cognitive abilities online, you can take the RIOT test. For more details about the RIOT test, check out this article.
Key Citations
Be the first to experience the RIOT IQ test. We will be launching with multiple paid IQ tests as well as a free IQ test. Sign up for exclusive updates and priority access.