🇺🇸The official website of Riot IQ

Are Racial/Ethnic Group IQ Differences Completely Environmental in Origin?

Jun 29, 2025
Average IQ score differences across racial and ethnic groups have persisted since intelligence testing began. Generally, individuals of East Asian ancestry score highest on average, followed by those of European descent, then Hispanics, with people of African ancestry averaging lowest. Substantial overlap exists among all groups, with individuals from every racial background found at all intelligence levels.

The scientific debate centers not on whether these differences exist, but on their causes. Experts agree that purely genetic explanations are implausible, given that environmental factors demonstrably influence intelligence (evidenced by phenomena like the Flynn effect and known environmental causes of lowered IQ). The core question is whether group differences stem entirely from environmental factors (the environmentalist position, where between-group heritability h²b equals zero) or result from both genetic and environmental influences (the hereditarian position, where h²b exceeds zero).

Understanding this debate requires recognizing that racial groups have biological foundations. They represent extended families sharing common ancestry from specific world regions, making members more genetically similar to each other than to outsiders. Genetic research confirms this, with DNA analysis accurately matching individuals to their self-identified racial groups with remarkable precision.

Critically, heritability within groups (h²w) differs from heritability between groups (h²b). While intelligence shows substantial heritability within populations, this doesn't automatically mean group differences are heritable. However, five evidence types suggest h²b exceeds zero for some comparisons:

First, mathematical relationships between h²w and h²b show that explaining the 15-point average IQ gap between Europeans and Africans through environment alone requires implausibly large environmental differences—larger than observed socioeconomic disparities.

Second, Spearman's hypothesis demonstrates that subtests measuring general intelligence more strongly show larger racial score gaps, suggesting common causes for within-group and between-group differences.

Third, measurement invariance tests confirm intelligence tests function identically across racial groups, indicating the same factors influence scores regardless of group membership.

Fourth, admixture studies reveal that individuals in mixed populations with greater European ancestry tend to have higher IQs, with correlations around 0.23 to 0.30.

Fifth, emerging molecular genetics research suggests some genes associated with intelligence in Europeans also predict IQ in other groups, though predictions remain less accurate for non-European populations.

Expert opinion has shifted dramatically over decades. Early surveys showed most scientists favored environmental explanations, but recent research indicates approximately 84-87% of intelligence experts now believe genetic factors contribute at least partially to group differences. Conversely, non-experts—including teachers and the general public—remain strongly environmentalist, with their views resembling expert opinion from the 1960s-70s.

From an evolutionary perspective, human populations encountered vastly different environments after leaving Africa 80,000-130,000 years ago. These varied conditions likely favored different adaptive traits, affecting not just physical characteristics but also cognitive abilities. Evolution operates on the entire organism, including the brain, making genetically-based psychological differences across populations unsurprising.

The precise h²b value remains unknown and likely varies depending on which groups are compared and their respective environments. Groups sharing similar environments probably exhibit higher h²b values. While frustrating to many, acknowledging the hereditarian hypothesis's likely validity for certain comparisons need not lead to despair, as this knowledge can inform beneficial social policies for all people.




From Chapter 28 of "In the Know: Debunking 35 Myths About Human Intelligence" by Dr. Russell Warne (2020)